<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Atkinson Makes a Fool of Himself Again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gamerheadlines.com/2009/11/25/atkinson-makes-a-fool-of-himself-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gamerheadlines.com/2009/11/25/atkinson-makes-a-fool-of-himself-again/</link>
	<description>News &#38; Views For Gamers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 21:53:47 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ted Mosby</title>
		<link>http://www.gamerheadlines.com/2009/11/25/atkinson-makes-a-fool-of-himself-again/comment-page-1/#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Mosby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 13:56:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gamerheadlines.com/?p=587#comment-68</guid>
		<description>This article is stupid at best, I&#039;m pro-games and anti-censorship but when I read about the barrage of falsehoods Atkinson is accused of making I was expecting something more than what is practically a correct assessment of the game. He says &quot;allows&quot;, so your defence is rather pathetic. The only mistake he makes is the points part, but that&#039;s hardly anything ground shattering, many (most?) gamers don&#039;t even know where all those thousands of points accumulate from, let alone a man who&#039;s never played the game. He&#039;s an idiot for his political standpoints, but he&#039;s done his research.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article is stupid at best, I&#8217;m pro-games and anti-censorship but when I read about the barrage of falsehoods Atkinson is accused of making I was expecting something more than what is practically a correct assessment of the game. He says &#8220;allows&#8221;, so your defence is rather pathetic. The only mistake he makes is the points part, but that&#8217;s hardly anything ground shattering, many (most?) gamers don&#8217;t even know where all those thousands of points accumulate from, let alone a man who&#8217;s never played the game. He&#8217;s an idiot for his political standpoints, but he&#8217;s done his research.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
